Judging
All 2017 judges are scientific and well-versed in the judging rubric. We are thrilled to have them graciously donate their time and expertise for our children. Projects will also receive judge scores and comments. This is to meant to enhance the education of each child and make the next project even better!
Each project will be judged on a set of criteria on a scale of 1 to 4, as grade appropriate.
|
Criteria |
Description |
|
The contestant creates a Question that clearly defines the experiment. |
- The question is clear and concise.
- The content is substantial and interesting.
- The question allows for a fair test.
- The question clearly identifies factors that can be measured and/or compared.
|
|
The Research allows the contestant to make a good guess at the answer to the question. |
- Student uses 3 sources of text and/or Internet based information.
- Relevant sources of text and/or Internet based information are referenced in the project.
|
|
The Hypothesis helps the contestant answer the original question |
- There is evidence the research was a source of thinking about the hypothesis
- The hypothesis is an educated guess about how things work
- The hypothesis is clearly stated. For example, "If _____[I do this] _____, then _____[this]_____ will happen."
|
|
The Procedure allows the contestant to measure/compare data to come to a conclusion |
- The procedure establishes a fair test
- The procedure allows for measurement of experiment results
- The procedure allows for comparison of data
|
|
The Data Collection helps the contestant analyze the results of the experiment. |
- The procedure is strictly followed and documented
- Observations are clearly described
- Data gathered is accurate and collected consistently
- Diagrams and/or graphs clearly illustrate the collected data
- Comparisons and other analysis are based on stated evidence
|
|
The contestant writes a Conclusion that summarizes the project and results. |
- A summary of the research, hypothesis, procedures, data gathering and analysis are all used to explain results
- A statement whether the results support or contradict the hypothesis is included
- A brief critique of the project’s success allows the reader to understand what might be done differently if conducted again.
|